It seems a certain self-described Canadian reviewer has reached a new nadir in his mad quest for quasi-authority. In this case, the chubster was reviewing a vodka made by an artisan distiller called Odd Society Spirits (who hereby earns a rare CJ commercial plug for putting up with unwarranted abuse)...
http://www.oddsocietyspirits.com/distillery/
So what's the rub and all the hub-bub?
Like all smaller distillers, Odd Society has the issue of having to sell lots of spirits - now - to pay for spirits that have to sit and age for future sale. Thus in addition to whisky for aging, they are almost forced to produce vodka and gin for immediate sales.
Odd Society has taken another necessary tack to distinguish their products and that is to take advantage of their artisan ability to create unique products.
A unique vodka: East Van Vodka
Quoting Odd Society:
The uniqueness is obvious. First, that it is NOT intended to be a neutral vodka. And second - unlike almost all unflavored vodkas - it is made with two passes through their lovely, 30 year old, 350 liter copper pot stills (Arnold Holstein, top quality). Last - and like single malts - it's made from fermented malted barley."This spirit is for the odd ones. It’s for the proud and the quirky, the charming and misunderstood.
Made from 100% malted barley grown in Prince George and malted in Armstrong, East Van Vodka is twice distilled in our small batch, European-made, copper pot still before it’s lightly filtered and proudly blended with purified Vancouver tap water.
Unlike most vodkas, East Van Vodka is not a completely neutral spirit. It is lightly fragrant, sweet smelling and incredibly smooth. Sip it straight if you want to. Consider it a single malt vodka."
Very impressive. Artisans like Odd Society deserve full support when earned. But not to the Chilly Chubster...
Ego run amuckluck...
Now I won't dwell on this reviewer's cracked scoring scheme, wherein every spirit is scored in fragments and where the fackin' bottle itself can get 10 points. Nope, it gets worse.
Chubby goes so far to recognize the uniqueness of the concept, and even likes the congeners that account for it - BUT - then persists in giving it a low score!? And why? Let's listen to his own drivelish reason (paraphrased)...
WTF?! Are you kidding me? The distiller worked hard to create a unique vodka, using quality malted barley, and a rare, pot stilled distillation to guarantee flavor - which he likes - but then he turns them around and jams it up their backside because it isn't neutral? Really?"Scoring is hard as the distiller did not intend a typical neutral vodka, but... it IS labeled 'Vodka'"
Apparently the cold weather must freeze good and fair judgement as well, enough so to allow unfettered and condescending ego to prevail. The real truth?
A reviewer worth his salt has the absolute obligation to review not only fairly and honestly, but more importantly based on the distiller's and spirit's stated intentions. To the contrary, this "reviewer" somehow believes that his own expectations and personal tastes must take precedence.
Beliefs like this are pure ego from a real snow flake...