Practical sugar tests cont - gin, vodka

This is the main discussion section. Grab yer cups! All hands on deck!
Post Reply
JaRiMi
Admiral
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 11:14 am

Practical sugar tests cont - gin, vodka

Post by JaRiMi »

Heh, just to add a little to this "sugar v no sugar" discussion...

As I have mentioned, there is a little joke about Cognac and added sugar (and oak extract). As we know, sugar really does change many person's perception of the quality of the product, since it rounds the corners of the spirit, so to speak, and lessens that "alcohol burn" as well. People perceive the resulting spirit as more "smooth" and "easy to drink".

I was travelling recently, and bought on purpose some "not-so-good" gin and vodka to try and to use as a foundation for some not-so-refined frozen cocktails to be enjoyed on a hot summer's day.

Price v quality - these products are certainly of excellent value. Used on their own for sipping / on the rocks, well...Suffice to say, their lack of refinement shows in the mouthfeel. The vodka is quite harsh, not so "smooth" as more expensive products, and the gin - eh, contains the right spices for a traditional London dry gin, but...again, it tastes rather harsh. What to do? BLINK (idea lamp inside my head lights up)!!!!! Let me "pimp" them!!!! :-)

For the vodka, I used ordinary white sugar, with the objective of taming down the harsh edge from the taste of this, uh, less refined spirit. Side by side, I have a few super-premium and premium vodkas (Finlandia, Absolut, Russki Standard Platinum, Ice Queen). I simply add a bit of sugar, and mix until sugar is dissolved. A slow process, but I have time to kill..

RESULT: By tasting tiny amounts of various products, and adding what I perceived as sufficient amount to take off the edge, I was able to vastly "improve" the product to a level where myself and a few mates could no longer easily at least differentiate the product from the rest. Voila! One cheap vodka brought up a notch in "quality"!! The spirit has no flavour added, since it is a vodka, but the added sweetness really makes it seem smoother and more pleasant to sip on the rocks or cooled as such.

How about the gin then? Well, same same, but I also could not resist infusing a little more spices in the gin, to add flavour. Juniper berries, sitrus peel - in tiny amounts - go in the bottle for a brief period. After a day, I note a subtle difference in the taste, mmm - more spicy! Ahh, thats more like it, but the spirit is still harsh...sugar, my old nemesis, time for you to do your magic!

RESULT: It is not the best gin, but if I poured it to an empty bottle of a "decent" brand and served it, I would wager a fair amount of money that nobody would be able to tell the difference. As is, I made 2 versions of it (with varying degrees of sugar and spices mixtures).

Are these now fine spirits? NO.

Are they more drinkable - because the original "as is" experience was not far from dreadful? YES.

Would I do this to any good "as is" product? NEVER.

Such alchemy is and should be reserved for the little chemists at home, like me - not to large companies trying to get us to pay extra amount of $$$$ for a crappy product that's doctored to be drinkable...
User avatar
bearmark
Beermeister
Posts: 270
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 4:35 pm
Location: Near Dallas Texas
Contact:

Post by bearmark »

Nicely done... thanks for sharing!
Mark Hébert
Rum References: Flor de Caña 18 (Demeraran), The Scarlet Ibis (Trinidadian), R.L. Seale 10 (Barbadian), Appleton Extra (Jamaican), Ron Abuelo 12 (Cuban), Barbancourt 5-Star (Agricole)
User avatar
Dai
Minor God
Posts: 796
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 9:33 am
Location: Swansea

Post by Dai »

Now now Jarimi, Diageo will be suing you if you're not careful. I wonder how many people are twigging that some of our premium brands are just your one notch above average spirit tarted up with sugar, just to make them taste like a premium spirit.
Life is under no obligation to give us what we expect!

My Link to Save Caribbean Rum Petition
JaRiMi
Admiral
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 11:14 am

Post by JaRiMi »

Gentlemen, despite of naturally doing this little test with tongue-in-cheek humorous (some would say devilish) mindset and mood, the resulting perceptions are not a joke.

By no means take my word for it: I implore you to test this on your own. The best part of it is, if you pick up a ten dollar bottle of less-than-smashing gin or vodka, and manage to muck it up with a little carefully added sugar to a point where it's undrinkable - who cares, right?!?!!!
:twisted:
User avatar
Capn Jimbo
Rum Evangelisti and Compleat Idiot
Posts: 3550
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:53 pm
Location: Paradise: Fort Lauderdale of course...
Contact:

Post by Capn Jimbo »

Having known JaRiMi for more years than I'd have imagined...


...he knows from whence he speaks. Like Ralfy, experimentation, home blending, et al is well worth the effort. Case closed. And when it comes to pimping a drink I bow to the J-man...


. . . . . . .Image
(JaRiMi and his sugar, "Ginny" at the Finlandia Open)
JaRiMi
Admiral
Posts: 313
Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2009 11:14 am

Post by JaRiMi »

Sweeeeettt!!!

:lol:
User avatar
Capn Jimbo
Rum Evangelisti and Compleat Idiot
Posts: 3550
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:53 pm
Location: Paradise: Fort Lauderdale of course...
Contact:

Post by Capn Jimbo »

Speaking of JaRiMi's white sugar manipulation...


Mother Jones recently did a nice myth-bust on white vs Turbinado sugar in terms of both nutrition and marketing. The Turbinado is commonly available here the form of "Sugar in the Raw", which comes in organic implying brown paper packets. Their whole pitch?

"Sugar in the Raw" is better for you, has special micro-nutrients (really) that has been refined out of common white table sugar. For this, this brown sugar costs nearly four times as much! Sure, for all those special benefits.

MJ cited the Mayo Clinic rejected the idea that the Turbinado had the same nutritional value (potassium, iron and calcium) as white sugar. As far as the molasses trace minerals of the Turbinado, the Clinic knew of no real studies to confirm any particular or special health values.

In other words - just a marketing claim.


Here's the real deal...

1. To obtain white sugar multiple boils are required,
2. turbinado sugar requires just one,
3. and early research indicates that brown sugar is "slightly" more expensive to produce

But not four times more! That price difference is based on marketing created demand, in this case based on made-up health benefits. The only real difference: taste. Brown sugar contains from 3.5 to 6.5% molasses.




*******
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/ ... an-refined
Post Reply