Hate to say it Dept: but as for Balcones...

This is the main discussion section. Grab yer cups! All hands on deck!
Post Reply
User avatar
Capn Jimbo
Rum Evangelisti and Compleat Idiot
Posts: 3550
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:53 pm
Location: Paradise: Fort Lauderdale of course...
Contact:

Hate to say it Dept: but as for Balcones...

Post by Capn Jimbo »

Believe me I'm not much pleased to report this...


Chip Tate has been kicked out of Balcones for his "damaging and reprehensible behavior". Tate has refused to give up control, has threatened to shoot the Chairman of the Board, and has implied he'd rather burn down the distillery than to give up control.

Over the past few weeks both Bear and I have given differing viewpoints of Chip Tate and Balcones. This is not surprising as Balcones' reviews are likewise quite mixed. But Balcones' Tate bothered me, especially once I viewed his self-centered and self-promoting, grandiose videos which were completely full of blather and blarney. I ended with this conclusion:
Moi:

"Compare to Balcone's whose novelty young crooked whiskies - successful within a narrow niche of new adopters - face incredible risks in scaling so fast to a broad market, who may just not dig fig/honey/sugar whiskies to the same extent. Not to mention the growing pains and problems of managing a much larger operation confounded by large investors who may not be as patient as he. "
Tate was all about ego and I truly had my doubts that he was ready or capable of expanding so dramatically. I opined that he'd have been much better off just selling to his faithful niche market for his hard-to-get novelty releases. I knew he was cruising for a bruising, but I had no idea it would be quite so soon or - gulp - quite so dramatically...
Waco Tribune (two days ago)

"A dispute among top managers at Waco’s Balcones Distilling threatens to disrupt the operations of the award-winning whisky maker and could jeopardize the funding of an ongoing expansion.

Disagreements between Charles “Chip” Tate, president and head distiller, and the young company’s board of managers have spilled from the boardroom to the courtroom, with board members obtaining a temporary restraining order to enforce its 90-day suspension of Tate, issued Aug. 8.

The board is seeking a temporary injunction against Tate, a minority interest holder in the company, alleging Tate “has engaged in acts harmful to Balcones.”
Bear, were you aware of this? A real stunner. It gets worse...
"Tate reportedly threatened the life of board chairman Greg Allen, suggested he would rather see the facility burn to the ground than be run by someone other than himself and continually has missed important meetings."
Tate was a gunowner and kept guns in his office. The filings state he threated to "put two (bullets" into the chest of the board chairman, ran up close to $15,000 with a company credit card (which he refuses to pay). Read the article for more...


Flat Ass Bottom Line

It takes ego, focus, patience and a thick skin to start a business. As I mentioned earlier in this saga, I believed that success came way too easily, too early and too fast. Unfortunately this gentleman came to believe his own grandiose blather, and the "awards" he paid for. He mistook his novelty for quality, good fortune for competence and even fancied himself "the next Balvenie or Macallan". I'd hoped that he would choose to grow more slowly, to buy the time and experience he needed to better understand his real niche and his business, and to improve his skills. I'd pointed out that rapid expansion is often the death of the small businessman. Believe me, I've seen this happen more than once and it isn't pretty.

Had this young man done so - slowly and building carefully on his early success - to gain real legs, he had a bright future ahead. Now he has destroyed his reputation, and lost all practical respect and credibility. He's even lost his company, equipment and products. His chances of recovery are slim at best. As far the new company goes, the Balcones' brand is at risk, without Tate's former reputation and severely wounded by his new one.

I do feel bad for him, but as well said by James Brown "...it's the big payback..."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IST6qRfVqwY

A failure snatched from the jaws of victory...




*******
http://www.wacotrib.com/news/business/m ... 0a001.html
User avatar
Capn Jimbo
Rum Evangelisti and Compleat Idiot
Posts: 3550
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:53 pm
Location: Paradise: Fort Lauderdale of course...
Contact:

Post by Capn Jimbo »

To be complete...


On the motion of the company, Tate has been completely shut down by order of the Court. He is forbidden from speaking about the company, may only visit the premises with permission, may not contact any employees, must return all company property, must provide all passwords to social media accounts for the brand, et al.

To me this young man presented as a ego-driven control freak. His videos were revealing. There was a thread on one of the big bourbon sites wherein a customer had complained about what he'd considered a bad batch. After much back and forth between his then new "ambassador" and other Balcones' followers, Tate himself finally registered and posted.

In that post, he denied that he ever makes a mistake, doesn't have bad batches and blamed the bad bottle on a distributor, a very unlikely possibility as others pointed out. What struck me was what appeared to be his very thin skin as well as the manner in which he lashed out. It seemed that he had a tough time with even mild criticism on a website, fer gawdssake.

Apparently for as much as he thought he knew about distilling, he may not have understood what such a dramatic and large ($10M) expansion means, particularly when the money isn't yours and you must now deal with the Board, as a minority interest. When you enter such a deal, it's simply business and you have to accept that it's no longer your me, myself and I small distillery.

Oddly he claimed that he'd turned down other suitors and waited until he finally found compatible investors. Was it a a case of bad judgement or a case of personal resistance to any significant measure of Board involvement? Or both or neither? The proof would be in the pudding, now served and not by a waiter.

He should have understood that, and he has only himself to blame for his decisions. What's truly amazing is just how fast and dramatically things apparently fell apart. Missing meetings, using the company credit card for personal items, and all the rest, we can only imagine.


What's next?

Is unclear. I read somewhere that September 19th is a key date - perhaps the day Tate's attorney will file an answer/counterclaim. I believe that both parties have a huge interest in making nice. Tate needs to take a chill pill, along with a big piece of humble pie. He needs to find God, to realize just how extreme and completely unproductive his alleged actions were. These seem to indicate an attitude of "It was my toy, it's still my toy, and if you try to take it from me I'll smash it and you too!".

I have no doubt that he's dealing with serious businessmen. Tate needs to be just as serious. Both have great incentive to make up with each other just as fast as they can, to save the brand. Tate must be honest with himself and with the Board, and prove to them, to the distributors and to the world that he can restrain himself.

This will surely require a cooling off period (which seems to be the goal of the company which has suspended him for 90 days). Perhaps he should - sincerely and humbly - consider anger management counselling. I hope he has some older, wiser and respected mentor who can take him out for a bottle of bourbon and have a good heart-to-heart with this young man.

It will be very difficult. Just as he was not ready for explosive growth, he may not be ready to face himself, do some real soul searching, admit his errors, take positive actions and make amends.

This is NO time for a second amendment solution. Truth? It's stranger than fiction. You just can't make this stuff up. This was a driven and extremely creative, worthy young man who had a good starting success. What a shame...
Post Reply