Bendover Dept: The "Edward Hamilton Selection"

This is the main discussion section. Grab yer cups! All hands on deck!
Post Reply
User avatar
Capn Jimbo
Rum Evangelisti and Compleat Idiot
Posts: 3550
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:53 pm
Location: Paradise: Fort Lauderdale of course...
Contact:

Bendover Dept: The "Edward Hamilton Selection"

Post by Capn Jimbo »

Bendover Dept: "The Edward Hamilton Selection"...

With two of rums' few visible websites being (a) a rep who knows the real truth about "rum" but won't tell it and (b) a rank, bittermouthed tannin tasting amateur who doesn't have a clue but spews endlessly anyway...

It's so easy to come up with new and interesting material for this section.

It'd make the basis for a new reality series called "The Rum Shills of North America", programmed against "The Wives of Sussex County". Just turn on the microphones and let em spew, while the audience howls with canned laughter. Such is the sad state of rum, leaving moi to simply and humbly report the latest hilarious adventures of the Odd Couple...


The "Ed Hamilton Selection"

So how far can you bend over? Not far enough. Things have been getting really boring lately with the Frozen Furry One running out of freebie, made-up rums contributed by his butt buddies over at the NLC, and yesterday's opening page at the Shillery wherein seven of the eight new posts were by the Prophet hisself.

This never happens unless things are really, really dead there.

And they are. So to spice things up, Ed Hamilton recently announced - what else! - the "Edward Hamilton Selection" of private label rums. Not the "Ed Selection" (friendly), nor the "Ed Hamilton Selection" (a bit more formal), not the "Ministry of Rum Selection" (need to protect the facade of non-commercialism) but - "The Edward Hamilton Selection". Formal and austere, with just the right touch of seriousness and authority.

Kinda like if Ford renamed their SUV the "Edward Bauer Edition", which would never happen. Ford, unlike our commercial friend, knows how to market to the masses and the "Eddie Bauer Edition" sold very, very well. My suggestion?

The "Eddie Hamilton Special Edition Rums".

Yup, I really like that, but don't go to your dealership quite yet. So just what are the "Edward Hamilton Selection" rums? Well... uh... umm... he doesn't know yet! Nope, the "Edward Hamilton Selection" hasn't even been selected. The great one - the galaxy's leading rum resource, who allegedly knows all things rum - doesn't have a clue. In fact, he's gonna defer to his clonic minions. Can you believe that?


The Announcement

Let's do a little deconstruction. First Eddie, er Edward, states "I'm looking at a few rums to bottle under my brand name...", but - uh - doesn't name the rums. What?! Next he claims that these mystery rums "...aren't the most expensive on the planet but rather rums that aren't in large supply...". Not expensive, and not in large supply? Wow, intriguing, but once again a state secret available only to a small cadre of authorized personnel.

Now here's where it get interesting!

Next: "Small batches of barrels that are representative of a region... so what would you like to have...?". That's right - he actually actually asks his minions, you know, the bozoa who usually ask him what they should drink! Remember, here's a guy who can spew chapter and verse about the marketing successes and failures of years past, who is a rum rep fer gawds sake and who should already know what's gonna work.

But instead he's going to poll the monkeys? Havabanana. And it gets weirder and weirder...


Hamilton finally recognizes "Styles"!


Yup. Although I cannot say I've read all of his mumblings, this is the very first time I've seen Edward actually recognize and emphasize "style". Indeed, our famous spat - the one where he refused to let me resign in peace - was largely based on my proposal that "styles" existed, needed to be recognized and further, to identify rums that by consensus were best representative of those styles. The originator of rum styles was Dave Broom - I promoted them - and which Eddie, er Edward, then soundly rejected at the time.

As for now?
Edward: "One of the styles I'm considering is an aged Jamaican pot still rum."
You heard it here first.

Edward has finally confirmed the Jamaican style! Oops, or has he? A "Jamaican pot still rum" surely will be Jamaican style, especially because the few Jamaican distillers have remained adamant in maintaining their style. But a "style" is simply that, a style - not a country, not a distiller. A style. But I'm gonna give him this one - I think he does mean "style" - but he gets a "C" at best for lack of clarity.

I'll also consider this a belated "I'm truly sorry" from Edward, for his long standing rejection of Broom's and my position. Accepted. Does this mean the end of his "...it's all good.." philosophy?

Say it ain't so, Jo-Jo!


Is the new mantra "...it's all good, but the 'Edward Hamilton Selection' is better..."?

It appears so, but only time will tell. Last allow me to relate yet another contradiction (or several really), this time in the same post. Usually you have to Google a bit to find them. Here goes...

1. Eddie's position was unclear, but after a couple years of The Rum Project promoting the "sweet spot" to be 7 to 10 years of age, he finally admitted that this was indeed true.

2. But in his announcement he then states "...Since I drink white, dark and rums aged more than 10 years, there will certainly be more than a few rums in this portfolio.". Does this mean he prefers rums that are outside the sweet spot? Which is it?

And last, but surely not least:

3. Regarding the selected small "batches of barrels" (he might try rewriting that one), and regarding his proposed release of a Jamaican pot stilled rum, he asks: "...would you rather have a young, one year old rum, or something that is easily (sp) to drink like a three year old rum?".

Wait a minute here!

Lessee. He admits a sweet spot (7-10 year) for rum, but because he drinks rums "over 10 years old", he then wonders if the monkeys would prefer a one year, or a three year rum?? Is up down? Or down up? Is it true that"...an orange and an apple are the same color except for the orange."? Good grief.


Bottom Line

What's amazing is this. In the two days this amazing and contradictory post went up, not a single monkey responded. Normally you hear a rousing chorus of "mee too" and other typical, sycophantic replies. Yes, Massa. Give me another one, my braless mistress. You know.

But the monkeys are stunned. The formerly rejected concept of Jimbo "styles" is now indirectly admitted. The "...it's all good" mantra - the Shillery's first commandment - has now been breached. And they are finally - for what seems like the very first time - asked for their, gulp, gasp - for their own, oh my, opinions!!

Instead of being told what to drink. Havabigbanana! I can't wait to see what happens. And apology accepted Edward, and please do take this note home to your mother. Stay tuned...
User avatar
Capn Jimbo
Rum Evangelisti and Compleat Idiot
Posts: 3550
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:53 pm
Location: Paradise: Fort Lauderdale of course...
Contact:

That's Capn Jimbo Sir to you, boy...

Post by Capn Jimbo »

Part Two: the monkeys finally reply...


Wow! It took three days but then the hairy bunch started to chime in. First sickophant of interest was the Leisuremaster "This sounds great Ed - except you'll have to work "rumifying" your name - a la Captain Morgan, Calico Jack, Sailor Jerry, Sergeant Classick...". Eddie's answer, and honest, I'm truly rollin on the floor...
The Edster: "I think I'm stuck with my name though maybe Pirate Ed, no scratch that. Sailor Ed, scratch that too. But Captain Hamilton does have a certain ring to it, maybe not."
Captain Hamilton?! Now I know I've succeeded in my mission. When I first proposed interviewing the greats of rum making - Eddie copied me. When I established the first "chat", he quickly followed. After promoting the "7 to 10 year sweetspot" for rum, yup, it wasn't long before Eddie joined me, and then - above - Dave Broom's styles (added to, heavily promoted and organized by me (see this entire forum), and now...

Captain Hamilton!? Listen monkeys, there's only one real Capn in rum and it's me! Cabin Boy Hamilton might be more like it. Every ship needs a cute one, braless and with long hair.


Hamilton discusses the Label
Edward: "I would only bottle a product for which I can tell you where it was distilled... a distillery with the name of the distiller... proof at which it went into barrel, for how long, when it was put in that barrel and the proof at which it was taken out...".
Actually this is really quite nice, but he left out the most important information... Does it contain unlabeled additives, artificial or natural flavors or spices, sugar, glycerol and the like? And if its a blend, the ages and amounts of each. And since he's now into it, how about the style?

Here's an example:
Eddie Hamilton's Jamaican Style Special Edition: "a molasses based rum sourced from Appleton Estates, from a single, pot-stilled double distillation, and aged for one year in first rum use American Oak bourbon barrels, followed by one year in a second use bourbon barrel, then rested for two more years in mellow third use barrels. Distilled at 85%, aged at 65%, bottled at 43% ABV. No chill filtering, coloring, flavorings or additives of any kind."
Don't hold your breath.

Private labels come and go all the time, can be extremely variable by the barrel, are rarely successful and worse yet, take years and lots of money to slowly earn the respect and the following of experienced rum drinkers. Great selections by great private labels are few in number, and command deservedly higher prices.

What we don't need is another Ron de Jeremy Lite.


Bottom Line...

His claim belies the concept. Any rum that is "one to three years" of age - and also "affordable" will not likely be a sipper, or collectable. It will depend for sales in the same way that the Shillery depends on a reliable stable of zoned out, "...it's all good" sycophants.

But you can bet your bottom dollar I'll be reviewing em...


*******
Note: though the Edster claims over 43,000 members (!), and high traffic, you'd think the response would have been far beyond the ten or so monkey regulars and their simplistic observations. Is this website dying? Survey sez...
Post Reply