Hypocrisy Dept: Artic Wolf dumps on Writer's Tears Whiskey

This is the main discussion section. Grab yer cups! All hands on deck!
Post Reply

Is the Arctic Wolf's review hypocritical and unfair?

Yes, absolutely.
1
50%
No, Whiskey's Tears deserves to be ridiculed.
0
No votes
Now I plan to buy a bottle.
1
50%
 
Total votes: 2

User avatar
Capn Jimbo
Rum Evangelisti and Compleat Idiot
Posts: 3550
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:53 pm
Location: Paradise: Fort Lauderdale of course...
Contact:

Hypocrisy Dept: Artic Wolf dumps on Writer's Tears Whiskey

Post by Capn Jimbo »

Mythbusting and Hypocrite Exposing - it's an art form!


It seems impossible, but the furry Mr. Wolf has managed to reach yet another nadir - a new personal low. This time it had to do with an Irish Whiskey called "Writer's Tears". As is common knowledge the Irish love their drink, particularly their fine beer and good Irish Whiskey. So do we all - particularly on St. Patrick's Day, a day of great revelry when we're all Irish.

Ireland is also known for their great writers, who like many others from around the world found both solace and inspiration from their whiskey. Some of these include:


Hunter Thompson.
Raymond Chandler'
John Cheever,
Tennessee Williams,
Dylan Thomas,
Dorothy Parker,
Edgar Allen Poe,
Truman Capote,
Jack Kerouac,
William Faulkner,
Charles Bukowski,
F. Scott Fitzgerald,
James Joyce, and not least
Ernest Hemingway (whose prodigious intake of Daiquiris is widely celebrated and even honored).

(Credit: Upton Sinclair’s “15 Leading Heavy Drinkers of the 20th Century” (The Book of Lists)

All were heavy drinkers, to say the least. Donald W. Goodwin, MD, professor of psychiatry, states "that over 70 percent of the American writers who have won the Nobel Prize in Literature were alcoholics, including Sinclair Lewis, Eugene O’Neill, William Faulkner and John Steinbeck." It is well known the passion of genius can have it's price.

Even in my own puny life, my best writing and free verse, mostly about lost love, were released by a good bottle of wine, and accompanied by tears and pain. It's the way it is. How many of us have found solace in a good spirit? How many of us have likewise celebrated with one? How many of us have mourned a loss and dedicated a round, or many, with a fine whiskey.

That's just life, and to do so is entirely honorable and understood.


So get to it already!

OK, OK. Seems that Mr. Wolf took great offense at "Writer's Tears" labels:
Front label: “I traded my tomorrows to remain in yesterday whiskey tears are falling now, each one cries another day …”

Back label: "Ireland has been blessed with great poets, and playwrights down through the centuries. However, most, if not all of our great writers suffered from writer’s block. Many sought comfort and inspiration from “The water of Life”… Whiskey. It was said that when an Irish writer cried, he cried tears of Whiskey.

Writers Tears is a salute to these great writers with a style of whiskey that was popular in Joyce’s Dublin…”
Mr. Wolf seems to pick two bones with "Writer's Tears":

1. He as much as acuses them of plagiarism, saying of the front label: "This is remarkably similar to the lyrics of the Dierks Bentley country song called “Whiskey Tears” (“I traded my tomorrows to remain in yesterday. Whiskey tears are falling here and each one cries her name“

2. Mr. Wolf then accuses the poor distiller of promoting alcoholism, a subject he appears to kinow very well, stating "I am troubled by these statements... which seem to imply that like Ireland’s great poets and writers, we should perhaps turn to a bottle of whiskey for inspiration when life places obstacles in our path. This doesn’t fit my idea of (being) socially responsible..."

Needless to say, Mr. Wolf is no stranger to alcohol, what with reviewing close to 400 spirits in a couple years, not to mention creating many hundreds more mixed drinks. Isn't there something about glass houses?

Based on these Mr. Wolf then punishes the distiller by deducting points from his review, stating "... I decided that I could not ignore... the statements on the front and back labels. My “Afterburn” score of 4.5 (and his "Bottle" score of 2.5 (most get 4.5) hopefully does justice to those mixed feelings." The horror, the horror!


Honestly, this is just unbelievable!

Let's start with his charge of plagiarism. Mr. Wolf has been known to borrow verbiage from distiller's websites, and once again seems to do it here:
Writer's Tears: "Pure pot still whiskey is a type of whiskey traditionally made from a mixture of malted and unmalted barley distilled in a pot still.

Mr. Wolf: "Pure Pot Still Irish Whiskey is traditionally made from a mash comprised of both malted and unmalted barley which is distilled in a pot still.

Writer's Tears: "Pure Pot still came about in 1802 as a reaction to the introduction of Tax’s by the British on Irish Malt Whiskey."

Mr. Wolf: "This style of whiskey was apparently produced as a reaction to British taxes on malted whiskey which were introduced in 1802."

Writer's Tears: "However in an effort to avoid taxes the Irish Distiller decided to use a higher percentage of unmalted barley... into the still".

Mr. Wolf: "To reduce the taxable amount on their whisky, Irish distillers began to add more unmalted barley into the distillation.

Writer's Tears: This resulted in a very different style of Whiskey and one which we have come to know as “Pure Pot Still."

Mr. Wolf: "The result was what we have come to know as Irish Pure Pot Still Whisky."
Using Mr. Wolf's own rope, his own words - in his own words - are "remarkably similar" to Writer's Tears website. How hard would it be to state "According to the distiller..."? The problem with throwing mud is that it's inevitable to get a little dirty.

Now let's consider the matter of scoring.

I have never accepted Mr. Wolf's rather bizarre scoring system. I know of no serious reviewer who actually scores the bottle, label and cap or cork. Want to mention it? Fine. But score it? Really? As Ralfy has so well said (paraphrased) "I could care less about the bottle, it's what's inside that counts. In fact, I'm suspicious of extravagant bottles and marketing - I'd rather the money went into the product.".

It's well to keep in mind that Whiskey's Tears gifted Mr. Wolf with a full bottle of their dear product. How must they feel at what they must surely consider an unwarranted slap in the face? Most readers will take Mr. Wolf's comments as serious and insultinig rebukes. Others will think he's full of it.

If Mr. Wolf felt that strongly about Whiskey Tear's innocuous and romantic labeling, he should not have reviewed the whiskey, and should have returned it. That would be honest and fair. But to engage in the tactics he professes to despise, to toot his own holier-than-thou horn, and to indirectly promote Whiskey's Tears and himself - albeit in a backhanded way - he may be guilty of his own misguided accusations.

Is Mr. Wolf a hypocrite? Are his criticisms fair? Is his scoring justified? You decide...
User avatar
Capn Jimbo
Rum Evangelisti and Compleat Idiot
Posts: 3550
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 3:53 pm
Location: Paradise: Fort Lauderdale of course...
Contact:

Mr. Wolf doubles down...

Post by Capn Jimbo »

Mr. Wolf doubles down...


I have been eagerly awaiting comments on Mr. Wolf's "review" and I was not disappointed...
Rebel: "I really enjoyed this one it would rate it a little higher, an 88 out of 100. A ton of flavor and very smooth."

Wolf: "If not for the unsettled feelings I have towards the brand messaging, I would be in agreement with you as the whiskey inside the bottle is excellent."
I continue to be amazed by this stance. Whiskey's Tears is guilty of nothing more than national pride in Ireland's revered writers and poets - who did in fact, love their tipple. The Irish take great pride in both their writers and their spirits. They take their drinking and camaraderie seriously. It's not unknown in the profession. Here in Florida, Key West is famous for their Hemingway Festival which celebrates his life of Daiquiri fueled writing and his love for fishing, cigars and rowdy camaraderie. The festival is not known for sobriety. Still, to give the furry one the benefit of the doubt, I engaged Mr. Google and read page after page of reviews and commentary on Tears.

I could find nothing but positive and proud commentary. Whiskey's Tears is a hit everywhere but at Mr. Wolf's remote den.

Has Mr. Wolf suffered a personal tragedy? Did he lose a loved one to alcohol? Did the label touch a painful spot? Who knows? If so, I understand - but do not condone - his public attack on Whiskey's Tears. And I stand on the notion that if he really was so offended by their innocuous and romantic label, that he should have returned the gift, and simply not reviewed it.

Instead he chose to publicly condemn what even he recognized as "an excellent" whisky, and to actually lower its score!. I'm flabbergasted...
da'rum
Minor God
Posts: 957
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 7:09 pm

Post by da'rum »

I don't know why you continue to bother with this clown Jimbo, you've made your point in several threads. He is a goose but you are now contributing to his popularity/infamy/notoriety by hounding him. In my opinion you do him a service and yourself a disservice.

Your point about this Whiskey tears is a good one but those who read that crap over at wolfs without a critical eye aren't going to be here to read your dismantling of it. Forget this industry man and focus your talents on investigating the distilleries and their dubious activities.

:wink:



*******
Capn's Log: I think you are right. Thanks.
in goes your eye out
Post Reply